|
在表达“为了……(目的)而做……”这种概念时,可以用“for
the sake of”来表达,相当于“because
of...”
或“for
the purpose of...”例如:
Let's not disagree for the sake
of
(=
because of)a
few pounds.
Let's say, just for the sake of
argument/for argument's sake
(=
for the purpose of this discussion),
that prices rise by 3 per cent this
year.
You're only arguing for the sake
of arguing
(=
because you like arguing).
此外,我们还可以用“for
its own sake”用来表达类似的概念,例如:
I study for its own sake.
Don't use technology for its own
sake. Use it when it's the best
or the only way to provide
information.
范文:私家车的利与弊
Advantages
and disadvantages of private cars.
With the
fantastic spur both in industry and in
economy in China, the number of people who
own private cars is on the rise. Some people
have bought cars of their own, and others
are planning to buy cars. But there have
been two quite different views on this
phenomenon.
Some claim
that there are many advantages brought about
by cars. First, the automobile industry
provides jobs for countless workers and
strong support for other industries. Second,
if conditions permit, owning a car can make
us work more efficiently. Finally, life will
become more convenient. A car allows one to
move freely and with a car there is no need
to wait for the bus in the cold or under the
burning sun.
However,
others strongly object to the increase in
developing private cars. They hold that
automobiles will give rise to a series of
problems. In the first place, as more and
more cars are produced and run in the
street, a large volume of poisonous gas will
be given off, polluting the atmosphere and
causing actual harm to the health of people.
Next, private cars contribute to traffic
congestion so greatly that the advantages
gained in comfort and freedom are often
cancelled out by the frustration caused by
traffic jams. The last problem is the
increasing number of car accidents that have
killed and will kill a lot of people in a
friction of a second.
In my
opinion, although automobiles have been
playing a vital part in the daily activities
of our society, they also bring us numerous
troubles such as more serious environmental
pollution, more traffic accidents and more
energy consumption. They drink up huge
amounts of fuel and throw out huge amounts
of pollutants. Traffic accidents kill
thousands and thousands of people each year
and cripple more. Jams waste our precious
time. Therefore I am against developing
private cars.
议论文写作素材-building theaters
Some people think that government shouldn’t
put money on building theaters and sports
stadiums. It should spend more money on
medical care and education. Agree or
disagree?
Disagree
1.
Theaters are places where different forms of
arts including films, concert, dramas and
operas etc., are shown or performed. Many of
them are educational and can teach people
about the history and culture of their own
countries and of other foreign countries.
They can also teach people about love and
hatred as in opera Romeo and Juliet; good
and evil as in the movie “Schindler’s list”.
2.
Apart from work, people should have some
entertainment to relax and enjoy their spare
time. If there are no movie theaters, people
will have no place to go for watching movies
and people’s lives will become less
interesting/dull indeed.
3.
Sports stadiums are places where sports
competitions are held which can increase
people’s awareness of the importance of a
healthy body. Then people will attach more
importance to physical exercises which is
the best way to prevent disease.
4.
Sports stadiums can also educate people
about fair competition as well the spirit of
cooperation. It also encourages people to
try to challenge one’s own limit in order to
achieve better accomplishment.
5.
Some theaters and sports stadiums are great
works of architecture and can represent a
country’s or a city’s wealth and level of
civilization. The Grand Theatre in
Shanghai becomes a symbol of
Shanghai.
Sydney Opera House is a landmark in
Sydney.
6.
Theaters are an ideal venue for cultural
communication and sports stadiums are good
places for strengthening good relationship
among nations.
议论文写作素材-theoretical knowledge VS.
practical training
Some people think that university should not
provide theoretical knowledge, but to give
practical training beneficial to the
society. Do you agree or disagree? Use your
own experience and knowledge to support your
idea.
1.
Theoretical knowledge IS beneficial to the
society.
a)
Theory study is providing powerful tools for
us to deal with the world around us as well
as the body within ourselves
Physiological/medical theories enable us to
understand the way our body works so that we
know how to combat diseases more
effectively.
Economics theory helps explain such
phenomena as inflation and unemployment.
Scientists, through theoretical study in
gravity and by pure calculations of the
orbits of planets Uranus and Neptune,
predicted the existence of the ninth planet
Pluto, which was later verified by
observation.
b)
Theoretical findings pave ways for more
advanced scientific as well as social
studies.
Take mathematics for example. Many people
are under the impressions that advanced
mathematical study in university is so
theoretical that it does not have any
practical value. However, the truth is that,
ours is an age in which all areas of science
are permeated more and more by methods and
approaches derived from theoretical
knowledge in mathematics. Even marketing,
once believed to be just an art of
persuading people to buy, is now becoming a
scientific subject based on statistical
studies of market data, which requires
profound mathematical knowledge.
2.
Practical trainings are based on theoretical
knowledge. / Practical trainings and
theoretical studies are interrelated.
a)
Some professions require that people have
solid understanding in theoretical knowledge
before going into practice in those
professions.
For example, to be a qualified doctor,
someone will have to first learn theoretical
knowledge at a medical school for a few
years in various related subjects including
medical science, humanities and social
sciences. Then at the final years at the
school, he or she will be given chance to
practice as an intern in a hospital to gain
practical experience. Only with a combined
knowledge both in theory and in practical
skills can a person truly become a
successful doctor. The same goes with a
number of other professions such as lawyers,
psychiatrists etc.
3.
We have specialized schools such as
polytechnic schools and vocational schools
etc. which can provide practical trainings,
for example schools specialized in teaching
cooking skills. Therefore universities
should focus more on theoretical knowledge.
议论文写作素材-old people VS. young people
Some people believe that in order to give
opportunities to new generations companies
should encourage high level employees who
are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or
disagree? Why?
| |
advantages/strengths |
disadvantages/weaknesses
|
|
young people
|
energetic and active
creative
bold, ready to take risks
fast learning
open-minded, ready to try new things
equipped with the latest concept in
business and management
|
inexperienced
not practical sometimes
having ambitious plans but not
down-to-earth approaches
not loyal, change work frequently
|
|
old people |
experienced
thoughtful
insightful
visionary
knowledgeable well-established
social network
loyalty |
physically not so fit
stiff-minded traditional
|
l
Old people should retire because they have
worked hard for so many years and should
take a rest. After retirement, they can live
on their pension and can enjoy their
retirement life traveling or taking care of
their grandchildren.
l
Old people should retire because it helps to
solve the unemployment problem of the
society by allowing more young people to
join the workforce.
议论文写作素材-culture and language
What are the reasons for losing a variety of
languages and culture?
Culture is the learned and shared behavior
of a community of interacting human beings.
And languages are the cornerstones of a
culture, defining who we are as a people.
Just as the world is becoming less
biologically rich, it is also becoming less
culturally and linguistically diverse. There
are a variety of reasons for the loss of
cultures and languages.
1.
Loss of Culture
a)
Technology
Technology has now created the possibility
of a global culture. With the invention of
telephone, fax machines and the internet,
communications are no longer limited by time
and space. Quick transportations such as
airplanes have swept away the old national
boundaries and shortened the physical
distance among people.
b)
Impact of global media and entertainment.
Global media and entertainment companies
shape understandings, values and dreams of
ordinary citizens wherever they live. Local
cultures are falling victim to a global
culture. Few students in
China like or even
understand Beijing Opera; instead, they
prefer
Hollywood films and international stars.
The
United States
dominates the traffic in information and
ideas. American music, American movies,
American television, and American software
are so dominant, so sought after, and so
visible that they are now available
literally everywhere on the Earth. This
American culture is influencing the tastes,
lives, and aspirations - in other words,
culture - of virtually every nation.
c)
Globalization - Economic cooperation and
foreign trade
Foreign investment and international trade
are taking place around the globe. This
economic globalization has lead to a global
culture. For example, a global fast food and
drink culture has been spread all over the
world by companies like McDonald's and
Coca-Cola. In the meantime, local food and
drink cultures are becoming less distinct
and some weak ones will be gradually lost.
d)
Immigration
Immigration has led to a more homogeneous
society. Immigrants give up their own
cultures in adaptation for the host
country’s culture.
e)
Physical damage done to communities either
by natural disasters, disease or war.
War in
Iraq
destroyed not only its regime but also a
culture that has developed for thousands of
years. American ideology will be
transplanted there.
2.
Loss of Language
The world now loses a language every two
weeks, a rate unprecedented in history.
The intricate combination of politics,
genocide, geography and economics conspire
in the demise of language.
Linguists estimate that in 100 years fewer
than half of the world’s 6000 languages will
still be in use. Will this mean a more
peaceful, communicative worlds or an aird
linguistic desert, subject to the tyranny of
the monoglot yoke?
a)
English is eradicating weaker languages
English language is becoming a dominant
language in the world. If someone speaks
English, he or she will have no difficulty
communicating with people in almost every
corner of the world. As a result, few people
choose other small languages to study as a
second language.
b)
Loss of small ethnic groups.
Some small ethnic groups live a closed life
without communication with the outside
world. When the number of people within
these ethnic groups diminishes, so do the
languages they speak.
c)
Political opposition to minority languages.
Some governments do not give official
recognition to minority languages or
aboriginal languages and do not encourage
people to speak these languages. So these
languages get less spoken and will
ultimately become extinct.
议论文写作素材-computers VS. teachers
Computers are widely used in education,and
some people think teachers do not play any
important roles in the classroom. To what
extent do you agree?
Computers can be a good aide to teachers in
the classroom but they can never take the
place of teachers.
1.
An important role of teachers is to
encourage students to learn. However,
computers are not capable of this spiritual
encouragement.
A teacher will notice that a student is not
interested in a certain subject and does not
listen carefully in class. The teacher will
talk with this student after class and find
out the reasons why this student is not
interested. Then the teacher can tell the
student the importance of this subject and
motivate the student to learn harder.
2.
Teachers have different approaches to
teaching different students and will adjust
the content or style of teaching according
to the needs of different students. However
computers only have fixed programs.
A teacher can even design a tailor-made
study plan for a particular student
according to his or her needs. But computers
view every student as the same individual.
3.
Apart from academic teaching, teachers are
also concerned about the psychological
growth of students and often teach students
about moral integrity. In contrast,
computers are just machines and do not have
feelings or emotions.
Teachers will teach students about such
virtues as love, honesty, moral integrity
and friendship etc.
4.
Computers are machines after all and
machines break down sometimes. If students
depend too much on computers for studying,
they will feel at a loss when these machines
go wrong and don not work properly
5.
Learning and teaching is a highly
interactive process. Different students will
have different questions during different
stages of teaching and learning. And the
teachers will have to answer them
accordingly and in different ways. But
computer programs are pre-designed by
programmers without knowing all the varying
circumstances during real teaching and
learning and therefore cannot give
satisfactory answers to all these questions.
Teachers can use computers as a very good
aide in the classroom for presenting
multimedia files. Teachers and computers can
co-exist in the classroom peacefully.
Teachers and computers can be a perfect
match in the classroom. For example, in a
listening lab equipped with computers,
students will be able to record the
listening materials in a CD-Rom and then
take home to listen more.
雅思范文:城市扩大
Since cities have changed a lot, the
size of the cities has grown enormously.
Discuss the causes and consequence of the
enormous size of cities.
Nowadays, the maps of cities are updated
frequently. With the development of city,
more and more suburbs become parts of the
city. When the cities in the world are
amplifying constantly, people discuss the
topic hotly, the causes and consequence of
the enormous cities. Different people have
different answers by their respective views.
In my opinion, the evolution of society
and the development of economy result in the
growth of the vast size of cities. Since the
number of population in every city is
increasing continually, people need a large
amount of space to live in. With the
progress of the technology, the output of
crops rises sharply. Fewer and fewer farmers
are required, as a result, more and more
villages urbanize. The growth of the cities
brings us many huge changes.
There are more job opportunities in the
cities. For instance, China will hold the
Olympic Games in Beijing in 2008. The
government is amplifying the size of Beijing
to build new gyms in order to hold it
excellently. Obviously, people in the cities
could gain a lot of new jobs.
Of course, the enormous size of cities
also has bad effects. Pollution is becoming
more and more serious all over the world
with the amplification of the cities. For
example, the poisonous gas sent off by
factories and automobiles has made the air
unhealthy for people to breathe. Water waste
keeps pouring into rivers and lakes; as a
result, many water species are dying out.
Furthermore, more people the city have, more
rubbish we can find.
In a word, since each coin has two sides,
we should be acquainted clearly with the
reasons why the size of the cities has grown
enormously and what it will bring us. Thus,
we could make full use of the positive
effects and overcome the negative effect
雅思范文:机器翻译VS学习语言
随着机器翻译技术的发展,孩子需要学习外语吗?
Some people think that machine
translation is highly developed in today’s
society. Therefore it is not necessary for
children to learn a foreign language. What’s
your opinion?
(Sample 1)
With the rapid development of modern
science, computers have been playing a more
important role in our daily lives. It is
such a worldwide trend that there is no
exception for Chinese.
Many people regard the computer as the
magic machine. It can solve many problems
quickly and efficiently, and best of all, it
can translate all kinds of languages. By
using the computer you can just put ail the
original versions into it and then you will
get the fast translation. So some parents
raise doubts about the necessity for their
children to learn foreign languages so hard
any more.
At first thought, it seems that the
computers can really help us to do so. But
if you look in- sue the matter deeply, you
may find a different answer. First of all,
machines can never replace mankind.
Computers are created by man and are
controlled by human brains. We can never
rely too much on machines; otherwise we will
become the slave of them one day. On the
contrary, we need to enrich our knowledge as
much as possible so that we can catch up
with the fast pace of the world. It is very
necessary to learn more languages so as to
upgrade our abilities to follow the progress
of the world.
And furthermore, it will do good to
children if they learn more languages. Both
their brain and their thinking modules can
benefit from it. When they grow up, they can
easily accept various kinds of cultures and
communicate with foreigners, which can
favorably enhance the mutual understanding
and develop international brotherhood.
So, we can clearly see that, though
computers can be good translators, people
still need to learn more languages with a
view to improving their abilities and
facilitating their future communication with
people from other cultures.
(Sample 2)
An argument occasionally these days is that
some people often think machine translation
can take place of the children's study of a
foreign language. As far as I am concerned,
I can't totally agree with this opinion.
It first comes to the point that machine
translation is not high efficiency. The
human language is so complex that nowadays
no such machine can translate one language
to another sufficiently and totally. The
machine can only provide some words or
pieces of half-baked sentences. So we human
beings, especially children, may not rely on
this kind of machine, at least recently.
On the other hand, if the real machine
that the whole sentence can be translated
completely turn to reality, children should
not be taught not study a foreign language.
The reason is the language (especially
speaking) is made up of not only the grammar
and words but also tones and mood. And when
children are studying a language, he is not
discovering an unknown area, but wild his
logic and ideation. Additionally, even if
the machine will be out of work one day
occasionally in future, he can talk with
other foreigners freely.
Frankly, the loss of language sensitivity
is much popular these days. Many people's
speaking and grammar is terrible. Children
often study wrong speaking from annoying TV
programs and untrained broadcasters. The
invention of translation machine will make
it worse. The problem whether to teach the
boys and girls foreign languages or not
needs to be treated seriously.
In a word, in modern society the
translation machine is stealing our
sensitivity of the language. People should
do something to prevent the loss of language
ability, especially in the childhood.
雅思范文:飞行器
Task: Motorized flight is the
greatest invention in the history. No other
inventions exerts greater impact. do you
agree or disagree.
New scientific inventions have
dramatically changed the way people live.
Motorized flight is one of the key
inventions in the history of technology.
However, as far as I am concerned, the
impact of motorized flight can be not
considered the greatest among all
inventions.
Apart from the motorized flight, other
inventions have contributed enormously to
our everyday life as well. Especially since
the “industrial revolution” took place, our
lives have been made much more convenient by
inventions such as trains , computers and
internet. Each invention has its different
functions and works in different fields. As
a result, it is hard to compare that which
one exerts greater impact. Even a pair of
chopsticks has impacted for almost 5000
years on the habit how people eat in China.
In addition, we should not only focus on
the motorized flight itself to announce that
it is the most important invention.
Admittedly, it made the dream of human being
become true, which people had been dreaming
for so long to fly in the sky. From thunder
and lightning to the electrical light, from
the invention of the wheel to the car,and of
course, without the invention of the screw;
nail; hammer and motor, there will be no
airplane.
In conclusion, the steps of inventing new
products will never stop in our
fast-developing society. Without suggesting
all the inventions are equally good, I think
we should not ignore other small inventions
as well, because every invention can be our
friends and support our way of life.
文化类写作考题范文一篇
With the process of globalization
and interaction among different nations, a
variety of native languages and cultures
have been lost.
What are the main reasons for and
effects of this phenomenon? And what
can countries do to save the great loss?
During the past
two decades, the trend of globalization has
been gaining momentum. Giant, multinational
corporations produce and sell their
commodities in almost every country.
Meanwhile, with the increasing interaction
among different nations and the dominance of
English as the most preferred international
language, cultural gaps have been largely
bridged and a number of native languages
have been lost. Although this phenomenon may
be a necessary step to economic prosperity,
the great loss of many native languages and
cultures is to be lamented. It is obvious
that globalization and the economic
development in many countries are the
culprits. In order to communicate with a few
industrialized nations, whose languages are
mainly English, French and German, many
developing countries have to sacrifice their
own native languages, and some of them even
adopt English as their only official
language, as in the case of
Singapore,
where the pre-dominant language in all mass
media is invariably English. Without
effective communication, opportunities for
free trade and prospects of economic
advancement are very slim.
However, the
sacrifices that these countries make for
globalization are far too great because the
loss of their native languages and,
subsequently, their cultures and traditions,
are virtually irretrievable. For example,
before the American continent was
discovered, there were thousands of native
Indian languages. But since the
USA established
itself and started to explore its western
territories, hundreds of these languages,
together with their unique cultures and
customs, have been vanishing every year.
This is certainly a devastating catastrophe
to the world’s lingual diversity and
cultural heritage.
Therefore,
governments of many developing nations
should take effective measures to preserve
their native languages and cultures. One
thing they can do is to emphasize their
national identities in all educational
levels. Schools and colleges should promote
cultural awareness and encourage patriotism
in their courses and extracurricular
activities. In a similar way, government
agencies and all civil services can use
English and their native languages
simultaneously as a good way of
accommodating globalization as well as
retaining their national heritage
In conclusion,
the growing trend of globalization and the
economic improvement in many developing
countries has resulted in the rapid
extinction of a wide range of native
languages and cultures. And governments must
take serious steps to save the huge loss and
play an important role in preserving their
own heirlooms.
8分范文
Nowadays, international tourism is the
biggest industry in the world.
Unfortunately, international tourism creates
tension rather than understanding between
people from different cultures. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
International tourism is booming: millions
of tourists go to other countries to explore
the outside world. Tourism enhances the
mutual understanding between the local
people and tourists. Some people hold
opposite opinions. They think that
international tourism causes tension rather
than promoting understanding between people
from different cultures.
The people holding the latter view suppose
that tourists are likely to offend the local
people because of the lack of knowledge of
the local customs, which differ from their
own. Moreover, tourism inevitably harms the
natural resources and the cultural legacy,
which may lead to the resentment of the
local people.
However, I can hardly assent to this idea:
the above mentioned rarely happens. In my
opinion, international tourism does
encourage the understanding between people
from different countries. For one thing,
without going to see for themselves, people
may never know what other countries are
really like and thus can be misled by
hearsay or films and TV programmes, which,
more often than not, are one-sided. For
instance, one of my American friends told me
that most Americans had a strange bias
against the Russian people until some young
Americans traveled to Russia and saw with
their own eyes that the Russians are human
beings just like them. Another example is
that, with the development of Chinese
tourism, people outside China start to
realize that Chinese men no longer have long
braids and Chinese women’s feet are of
normal size now. Secondly, having seen the
fine scenery or experienced the rich culture
of other countries, tourists will have the
desire to develop a good relationship with
the locals, which certainly contributes to
the understanding between them.
In conclusion, instead of causing tension,
international tourism furthers the
understanding of people from different
countries. (281 words)
雅思写作范文一篇(社会类话题)
Should rich countries help poorer ones?
Today, the world is becoming more and
more closely linked. Trade has increased and
the movement of people between countries is
greater than ever before. However, billions
of people still live in poverty, and in many
places, the gap between rich and poor is
widening. This essay will look at the
arguments for and against helping poor
countries.
There are many reasons for helping poor
countries. First of all, there are
humanitarian reasons. Like individuals who
give to charity, many countries feel it is
their religious, social, or moral duty to
help people in other countries who are
suffering from famine, drought, war, or
disease. However, many rich countries also
donate money for political or diplomatic
reasons. They want to maintain a
relationship of dependency with the
recipient, or simply to influence the
government and direction of the country. A
further reason why many countries help
poorer ones is for economic reasons. The
donors may want to control the supply of
commodities such as oil, water, or wheat.
Alternatively, the richer country may want
to ensure markets for their own products,
whether these are planes, computers or
shoes.
However, aid is not necessarily the best
way to help a country. For one thing,
billions of dollars of aid often goes
missing, into corrupt governments or
inefficient administration. A second point
is that many foreign aid projects are
unsuitable for the target country. Many
agencies build huge dams or industrial
projects that fail after a few years or that
do not involve the local people.
Furthermore, much aid returns to the donor.
This can be in the form of expensive
specialized equipment and experts from the
donor country.
There are many other ways we can help
poor countries. Opening up trade barriers,
so that poor countries can sell their goods
is one way. Another is to remove subsidies
so that imported goods from poorer countries
can compete fairly. A third method is to
forgive debts. Many poor countries have huge
interest repayments on old loans.
The needs of the poorer countries may
seem obvious. However, although our humanity
makes us want to help eliminate poverty and
suffering, we must examine the real needs of
poor countries and implement solutions that
will benefit both them and us.
373 words
雅思写作范文一篇(教育类话题)
Education: Losing Its Value
Today, more and more people are attending
third level education, and many go on to
post-graduate degrees. People specialize in
subjects that were not dreamed of a century
ago. However, the result has not been an
increase in real knowledge, but a cheapening
of education. In this essay I will discuss
how education has become devalued.
Education is now something that can be
purchased. Like a powerful new car or an
architect-designed house, a degree or a
post-graduate degree has become a luxury
that everyone wants. But when everybody has
something, that thing becomes worthless.
Gold is sought after because it is expensive
and hard to find, but if everybody changed
their attitude to gold, its value would
drop.
In the same way, education, like the
currency of a bankrupt country, is becoming
devalued as more people have degrees. It
takes ever-higher qualifications to get a
job. Once a degree-holder was respected and
listened to. Now he or she is just another
job-seeker or employee.
One effect of the rush towards degrees is
that knowledge becomes less important. Other
factors, such as influence, are more central
in getting a job or a promotion when
everyone has a qualification. A further
point is that people lose respect for
themselves. Since everybody has a degree,
even degree-holders feel that what they have
is almost worthless. More seriously, the
pressure to have degrees results in a drop
in quality. When thousands of people study
in a college, the professors cannot possibly
maintain standards. Furthermore, we need to
question whether advanced education is
suitable for everyone. Does our entire
population really need to spend years in
school and college just to do fairly simple
jobs?
In conclusion, there are many negative
aspects to the increased emphasis on
qualifications. If we want to maintain the
value of education, we need to examine the
emphasis we put on degrees.
313 words
环境类写作考题范文一篇
Many people believe that human
activity is causing the earth’s temperature
to rise. They say that this global warming
will have dreadful consequences for our
environment, such as drought and flooding.
What should governments do to help prevent
global warming?
Give reasons for your suggestions.
The earth’s temperature is rapidly
changing. As a result there has been a lot
of climate change such as heat waves,
droughts and floods. Scientists believe that
this is the result of human activity, which
is polluting the Earth’s atmosphere. This
could become a disaster if governments do
not act to help prevent global warming. They
can act in three ways; by supporting
research, by making laws and by keeping the
general public informed.
Firstly, governments can support research.
For example, they should encourage companies
to develop vehicles that cause less
pollution. They should also support
alternative sources of electricity from wind
and water rather than from oil and coal. As
well, they should sponsor conferences to
discuss the effects of greenhouse gas
emissions and possible solutions to the
problem.
Secondly, they should make laws that limit
the amount of greenhouse gases that
companies can emit. Private companies
should be rewarded for following these
laws. They should also be punished for
creating pollution.
Finally, everybody is affected by global
warming. Therefore, it is important that
governments involve individuals in the
problem solving process. For example they
should encourage households to save as much
energy as possible by using more efficient
light bulbs or less hot water. They should
also encourage the public to recycle, and
this should be compulsory for everyone.
Another way of saving energy is by public
transport systems. Governments should spend
money on public transport to make it as easy
as possible for the public to save energy.
In summary, it is clear that there are a lot
of things that governments can do to prevent
global warming. They should involve
companies, support scientists and encourage
individuals to protect the planet.
写作范文一篇
Nowadays we are producing more and
more rubbish. Why do you think this is
happening? What can governments do to help
reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
I think it is true that in almost every
country today each household and family
produces a large amount of waste every week.
Most of this rubbish comes from the
packaging from the things we buy, such as
processed food. But even if we buy fresh
food without packaging, we still produce
rubbish fro |